Fakes , Copies & Reproductions



My definition of a faked or copied item is an item that was not authentic or genuine to the Rhodesian Security Forces. While the 3 Commando, RLI, 'Lovers' Wing was not official, the wearing of it on the combat uniform was obviously tolerated to an extent. This also applied to certain patches worn by the BSAP PATU Units. These patches I consider genuine. It is my opinion that badges or insignia that were not official issues or not made in Rhodesia cannot be claimed as genuine Rhodesian insignia. A large number of badges and insignia were made in England and were official issue during the time of Southern Rhodesia and after UDI. These are of course genuine items. Berets that were made in Botswana and were official issue to the Selous Scouts, SAS, RLI and RAR among others are of course genuine.

I have differentiated between the word fakes and the word copies. My definition of a FAKE is an item of militaria that is not authentic or genuine or did not exist. My definition of a COPY is an item of militaria that is an imitation, reproduction, or transcript of an original. Both are as bad as the other if being sold as genuine.

DEFINITIONS from Dictionary.com

    fake - verb (used with object) 1. prepare or make (something specious, deceptive, or fraudulent):

    copy - noun 1. an imitation, reproduction, or transcript of an original:

    reproduction - noun 3. something made by reproducing an original; copy; duplicate:


    Some pointers that a prospective buyer should be aware of when buying Rhodesian militaria:

    1. SERVICE NUMBERS: The name or service number of a person written inside a uniform, on an item of clothing or on a piece of equipment does not automatically guarantee authenticity.
    2. PRIVATE LISTINGS (AUCTIONS) ON EBAY: I am always concerned when a seller on ebay uses 'Private Auctions' where a bidders ID is kept private. I cannot see any reason that a person would want their ebay username from being listed as the winner of an item. If it is a 'Private Auction' then the username of the winning bidder will only ever be known if and when he/she leaves feedback for the seller. This can be found in the seller's feedback. However after the auction has closed the item number will never be shown, in place of the item number will be the word 'Private'. Therefore you can't see what item the seller bought, ie you cannot see whether the item they have purchased is a fake or genuine. Obviously not all items being sold by 'Private Auctions' are fakes. However if someone wanted to sell a fake on ebay, a good way to do it would be to list the item as a 'Private Auction'. I have been a member of ebay since March 2002 and I have a feedback rating of 849, 364 of that feedback is as a seller but I have never listed anything as a 'Private Auction'. Caveat Emptor
    3. FEEDBACK RATINGS ON EBAY: A seller on ebay that has a feedback rating of 100% or is a Power Seller does not guarantee that they don't sell fakes or copies.
    4. ITEMS BELONGING TO RELATIVES: The seller claims that the item came from a relative or friend who served or lived in Rhodesia. Well that could be true but it doesn't make the item genuine. Do your research before bidding.
    5. LETTER OF AUTHENTICITY: A letter of authenticity from the seller really doesn't mean anything, because anyone can write what they want. A letter of autheticity from a recipient is an entirely different matter altogether.
    6. PHOTOS OF ITEMS FOR SALE: As a prospective buyer you are entitled to see clear, detailed, close-up photos of the item that is for sale. This includes photos of the reverse of badges, patches, insignia and wings, as most fakes and copies can be discovered this way. Any seller that refuses or makes excuses for not supplying these photos I would be wary of.
    7. MEDALS TO SPECIAL FORCES: On a number of occasions I have seen medals that are listed as belonging to a Trooper and the seller states that the recipient obviously served in the SAS, Selous Scouts or the RLI. What the seller has failed to tell you is that there were also Troopers in the Greys Scouts and the Armoured Car Regiment.
    8. AUTHENTIC DESCRIPTION OF A GENUINE ITEM: Some items that are genuine are described as something else or the description is enhanced to suggest that the item belonged to a unit that was Special Forces or a unit that saw more action, therefore hoping to attract a higher price at auction or point of sale.
    9. AUTHENTICITY: If you can't substantiate the authenticity of an item and you have doubts, my advice is to not buy it.
    10. DONATIONS TO CHARITIES: Be cautious of sellers who claim that a percentage of the sale price of the item is being donated to charity, unless they have a donation link direct to the charity or you have absolute proof that the seller has in fact donated to the said charity.





Disclaimer

THIS WEB PAGE LIKE THE REST OF THIS WEBSITE IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, SO THAT COLLECTORS or INTERESTED PEOPLE CAN MAKE COMPARISIONS BETWEEN A GENUINE ITEM AND A FAKE ITEM.

The majority of these sellers have been notified by me that there is something wrong with the authenticity of their item or items. Sellers who are continually listing fakes are no longer notified by me but have the links to their listed fake items placed here.

THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE NOT GENUINE, BUT ARE FAKES, COPIES OR MADE-UP TO APPEAR GENUINE. THE FEW GENUINE ITEMS THAT ARE SHOWN ARE BEING LISTED AS SOMETHING OTHER THAN WHAT THEY ARE.



28 July 2010

Southern Rhodesian NCO - Para/ Instructors Beret with Badge - Comment: This is a British Parachute Regiment beret. Members of the Parachute Regiment did not para train each other or anyone else. They were para trained by British PJI's and the beret exhibited in this listing is not a British PJI beret.

The RLI were NOT trained by British PJI's but by Rhodesian PJI's and not until 1976. Later some of them were para trained by South African Para Instructors at Bloemfontein.

How could the RLI be para trained outside Bulawayo when there were never any facilities to para train them there.

28 July 2010

Greys Scouts collar badges

28 July 2010

Selous Scouts collar badges

25 July 2010

Rhodesian SAS white metal belt buckle & clasp - Rare Item - Comment: This seller has sold at least eight of these buckles. CAVEAT EMPTOR! This seller obviously has a number of these buckles in his possession as he continues to sell them on ebay. This is NOT a SAS buckle and clasp but the Rhodesian Army General Issue buckle that was worn on the white plastic belt. Worn with the Dress uniform (Greens) as shown in the photo below of the RLI. Why are the RLI wearing the belt that is supposed to be a belt worn by the SAS? The reason: IT IS A RHODESIAN ARMY GENERAL SERVICE BUCKLE AND BELT that was worn by numerous regiments when in dress uniform.

This seller ignored my message telling him what type of buckle this was and yet on one of his listings with Rhodesian items states that he knows NOTHING ABOUT THE CONTINENT and yet seems to want to add unsubstantiated claims from Wikipedia and false claims that these buckles are for the Rhodesian SAS.

25 July 2010

The Police Cross For Conspicious Gallantry (PCG) - Comment: This seller continues to list this medal and others as rare Rhodesian medals. The seller has been notified by me some time ago that they are NOT genuine but are poorly made copies. The seller has a Buy It Now price of US$1,500 for this copy.

25 July 2010

Southern Rhodesian MP beret & badge. - Comment: (Private listing)

23 July 2010

RhGSM. - Comment: (Private listing) The seller of this medal has stated the following on the listing:
  1. The medal is named and numbered and is genuine. The recipients name and service number will only be given to the winning bidder so as to respect the recipient's privacy.


  2. My questions and opinions are:

    1. How does any potential buyer know that the medal is genuine if they are unable to see a photo of the naming on the medal?
    2. Who the recipient is and the regiment they served with determines the price of the medal. If the recipient was KIA or WIA this also adds to the value of the medal. How can a potential buyer determine the correct value of the medal without knowing this information?
    3. Some collectors only collect medals to certain regiments or units. How is a potential buyer going to determine whether to buy this medal when they don't know who the recipient was?
    4. Why 30 years after the war would the recipient, if they were alive, care about their medal being sold. RhGSM's are listed on the market all the time. I buy medals from around the world and I have only ever seen once where the seller refused to show or supply the names of the recipients. I might add that they have been on the market for well over a year and are still on the market. Buyers have a responsibility to be genuine and supply this information to the public. If it is not supplied I would refuse to buy it.
    5. The seller has also stated that this medal is a Southern Rhodesaian medal. Well in fact Charles it is spelt Rhodesian. This IS NOT a Southern Rhodesian Medal. It was Rhodesia Warrant No. 1 of 1969.
    6. The photo of this part of the Warrant clearly states THE RHODESIA GENERAL SERVICE MEDAL. This is because the country was Rhodesia NOT Southern Rhodesia as this seller is trying to make out.


      Why has this seller now sent a photo of the naming on this medal to a prospective buyer in the UK when he states that "the recipients name and service number will only be given to the winning bidder so as to respect the recipient's privacy." Surely it should be one standard for every prospective buyer and if one should know the recipient of the medal then all and sundry should also know that information. Caveat Emptor!

      21 July 2010

      Sth Rhodesian Metal Parachute Qualified Badge. - Comment: (Private listing) This badge was NEVER associated in any way with the Defence Forces in Southern Rhodesia or the Security Forces of Rhodesia. This is a Zimbabwe Army Parachute Regiment beret badge, post 1980. This seller obviously has no idea of what constitutes genuine Rhodesian or Southern Rhodesian militaria. If he did, he would know that there was not a Parachute Regiment in Southern Rhodesia and only 'C' (Rhodesia) Squadron SAS were para trained after 1961 in Southern Rhodesia.

      This seller has since made a verbal attack on his listing regarding my criticism of him falsely listing this badge as a Southern Rhodesian Parachute Qualification badge and his false description of the badge and further criticism of my knowledge of when the RLI were para trained.

      The first RLI were para trained in August 1976 at No.1 Parachute Training School, Rhodesian Air Force, New Sarum, Rhodesia. How then could the RLI be para trained in Southern Rhodesia which ceased to exist in 1964 when the Parliament renamed the country as Rhodesia? It couldn't so the only reasonable explanation in defense of history is that the seller of this badge is talking pure unadulterated rubbish! The seller's lack of knowledge on this subject has gone so far as to rename the Rhodesian Light Infantry as the Southern Rhodesian Light Infantry, which of course was never the name of the regiment.

      21 July 2010

      RhGSM. - Comment: (Private listing) The seller of this medal has stated the following on the listing:
      1. The medal is named and numbered and is genuine. The recipients name and service number will only be given to the winning bidder so as to respect the recipient's privacy.


      2. My questions and opinions are:

        1. How does any potential buyer know that the medal is genuine if they are unable to see a photo of the naming on the medal?
        2. Who the recipient is and the regiment they served with determines the price of the medal. If the recipient was KIA or WIA this also adds to the value of the medal. How can a potential buyer determine the correct value of the medal without knowing this information?
        3. Some collectors only collect medals to certain regiments or units. How is a potential buyer going to determine whether to buy this medal when they don't know who the recipient was?
        4. Why 30 years after the war would the recipient, if they were alive, care about their medal being sold. RhGSM's are listed on the market all the time. I buy medals from around the world and I have only ever seen once where the seller refused to show or supply the names of the recipients. I might add that they have been on the market for well over a year and are still on the market. Buyers have a responsibility to be genuine and supply this information to the public. If it is not supplied I would refuse to buy it.
        5. The seller has also stated that this medal is a Southern Rhodesaian medal. Well in fact Charles it is spelt Rhodesian. This IS NOT a Southern Rhodesian Medal. It was Rhodesia Warrant No. 1 of 1969.
        6. The photo of this part of the Warrant clearly states THE RHODESIA GENERAL SERVICE MEDAL. This is because the country was Rhodesia NOT Southern Rhodesia as this seller is trying to make out.


          Why has this seller now sent a photo of the naming on this medal to a prospective buyer in the UK when he states that "the recipients name and service number will only be given to the winning bidder so as to respect the recipient's privacy." Surely it should be one standard for every prospective buyer and if one should know the recipient of the medal then all and sundry should also know that information. Caveat Emptor!

          20 July 2010

          RhGSM. - Comment: (Private listing) The seller of this medal has stated the following on the listing:
          1. The medal is named and numbered and is genuine. The recipients name and service number will only be given to the winning bidder so as to respect the recipient's privacy.

          2. Why has this seller now sent a photo of the naming on this medal to a prospective buyer in the UK when he states that "the recipients name and service number will only be given to the winning bidder so as to respect the recipient's privacy." Surely it should be one standard for every prospective buyer and if one should know the recipient of the medal then all and sundry should also know that information. Caveat Emptor!

            19 July 2010

            Sth Rhodesian Metal Parachute Qualified Badge. - Comment: (Private listing) This badge was NEVER associated in any way with the Defence Forces in Southern Rhodesia or the Security Forces of Rhodesia. This is a Zimbabwe Army Parachute Regiment beret badge, post 1980. This seller obviously has no idea of what constitutes genuine Rhodesian or Southern Rhodesian militaria. If he did, he would know that there was not a Parachute Regiment in Southern Rhodesia and only 'C' (Rhodesia) Squadron SAS were para trained after 1961 in Southern Rhodesia.

            This seller has since made a verbal attack on his listing regarding my criticism of him falsely listing this badge as a Southern Rhodesian Parachute Qualification badge and his false description of the badge and further criticism of my knowledge of when the RLI were para trained.
            The first RLI were para trained in August 1976 at No.1 Parachute Training School, Rhodesian Air Force, New Sarum, Rhodesia. How then could the RLI be para trained in Southern Rhodesia which ceased to exist in 1964 when the Parliament renamed the country as Rhodesia? It couldn't so the only reasonable explanation in defense of history is that the seller of this badge is talking pure unadulterated rubbish! The seller's lack of knowledge on this subject has gone so far as to rename the Rhodesian Light Infantry as the Southern Rhodesian Light Infantry, which of course was never the name of the regiment.

            I remind this seller that I am the person authoring the book on the history of the Rhodesian Parachute Training School and speaking to former PJI's so I think I might know a little bit more about parachuting in Rhodesia than him.

            16 July 2010

            Southern Rhodesian Signals beret and badge. - Comment: (Private listing)

            16 July 2010

            Southern Rhodesian MP's beret and badge. - Comment: (Private listing)

            14 July 2010

            Very Rare SAS Badge. The first original one. - Comment: (Private listing) The seller has stated that this is an original WWII era SAS badge and that it is the first original one.

            FACT: This is actually a Malaya Command patch and to my understanding was worn by HQ staff during the Malayan Emergency. The dagger on the patch is actually a Kris which is indigeneous to Malaysia, Indonesia and other parts of South East Asia. This IS NOT an SAS patch or the first original SAS badge. It is also not rare. Photos of this patch and the green one can be seen on page 108 of Jonathon Pittaway and Craig Fourie's excellent book "SAS Rhodesia". These patches were worn by numerous units in Malaya and not just by the Malayan Scouts (SAS).

            14 July 2010

            Sth Rhodesian Metal Parachute Qualified Badge. - Comment: (Private listing) This badge was NEVER associated in any way with the Defence Forces in Southern Rhodesia or the Security Forces of Rhodesia. This is a Zimbabwe Army Parachute Regiment beret badge, post 1980. This seller obviously has no idea of what constitutes genuine Rhodesian or Southern Rhodesian militaria. If he did, he would know that there was not a Parachute Regiment in Southern Rhodesia and only 'C' (Rhodesia) Squadron SAS were para trained after 1961 in Southern Rhodesia.

            12 July 2010

            RhGSM. - Comment: (Private listing) The seller of this medal has stated the following on the listing:
            1. The medal is named and numbered and is genuine. The recipients name and service number will only be given to the winning bidder so as to respect the recipient's privacy.


            2. My questions and opinions are:

              1. How does any potential buyer know that the medal is genuine if they are unable to see a photo of the naming on the medal?
              2. Who the recipient is and the regiment they served with determines the price of the medal. If the recipient was KIA or WIA this also adds to the value of the medal. How can a potential buyer determine the correct value of the medal without knowing this information?
              3. Some collectors only collect medals to certain regiments or units. How is a potential buyer going to determine whether to buy this medal when they don't know who the recipient was?
              4. Why 30 years after the war would the recipient, if they were alive, care about their medal being sold. RhGSM's are listed on the market all the time. I buy medals from around the world and I have only ever seen once where the seller refused to show or supply the names of the recipients. I might add that they have been on the market for well over a year and are still on the market. Buyers have a responsibility to be genuine and supply this information to the public. If it is not supplied I would refuse to buy it.
              5. The seller has also stated that this medal is a Southern Rhodesaian medal. Well in fact Charles it is spelt Rhodesian. This IS NOT a Southern Rhodesian Medal. It was Rhodesia Warrant No. 1 of 1969.
              6. The photo of this part of the Warrant clearly states THE RHODESIA GENERAL SERVICE MEDAL. This is because the country was Rhodesia NOT Southern Rhodesia as this seller is trying to make out.

                12 July 2010

                Rhodesian SAS white metal belt buckle & clasp - Rare Item - Comment: This seller has sold at least eight of these buckles. CAVEAT EMPTOR! This seller obviously has a number of these buckles in his possession as he continues to sell them on ebay. This is NOT a SAS buckle and clasp but the Rhodesian Army General Issue buckle that was worn on the white plastic belt. Worn with the Dress uniform (Greens) as shown in the photo below of the RLI. Why are the RLI wearing the belt that is supposed to be a belt worn by the SAS? The reason: IT IS A RHODESIAN ARMY GENERAL SERVICE BUCKLE AND BELT that was worn by numerous regiments when in dress uniform.

                This seller ignored my message telling him what type of buckle this was and yet on one of his listings with Rhodesian items states that he knows NOTHING ABOUT THE CONTINENT and yet seems to want to add unsubstantiated claims from Wikipedia and false claims that these buckles are for the Rhodesian SAS.

                03 July 2010

                Southern Rhodesian MP beret. - Comment: (Private listing)

                03 July 2010

                SAS Long Range Desert Group 1944 beret badge. - Comment: (Private listing)

                30 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian RLI beret. - Comment: (Private listing) Beret has Rhodesian period RLI beret badge. If it was Southern Rhodesian the beret badge would have the Queens Crown on the top.

                This seller's claims (he has copied from wikipedia) that Rhodesia was never named that legally because the name had not been changed as required under the law when it was the Colony of Southern Rhodesia are irrelevant. This is why. When Prime Minister Ian Smith declared the Unilateral Declaration of Independence from the United Kingdom on the 11 November 1965, under the law in that country then the former colony of Southern Rhodesia became Rhodesia. It is irrelevant that the British Government always referred to Rhodesia as the Colony of Southern Rhodesia as the colony had declared independence and parliament physically controlled all arms of the country including the military, police, banking, the economy etc. In 1970 when the government declared Rhodesia as a Republic all symbols of the Crown were removed. It was irrelevant what the British Government said about the name of Rhodesia at that time as the country had become independent. This seller is trying to use a pedantic and a revisionist point that quite clearly is wrong and it is equally wrong for this seller to label items as Southern Rhodesian when they were clearly made during the period of 1965-1979 and therefore are Rhodesian.

                30 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian Proficiency Red Cross Medal. - Comment: (Private listing) A British Proficiency in Red Cross work award. These are NOT Southern Rhodesian awards but British awards which also extended to their Territories. While this award could be awarded to someone living in Southern Rhodesia it would have to have written provenance to prove that.

                27 June 2010

                SAS beret. - Comment: (Private listing)

                25 June 2010

                SAS Mess Dress Wings. - Comment: (Private listing)

                25 June 2010

                SAS Beret badge. - Comment: (Private listing)

                25 June 2010

                SAS Mess Dress Para Wings. - Comment: (Private listing)

                25 June 2010

                Special Forces. - Comment: (Private listing)

                25 June 2010

                Rhodesian Special Forces beret flash. - Comment: (Private listing)

                23 June 2010

                SAS Long Range Desert Group 1944 beret badge. - Comment: (Private listing)

                23 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian MP beret. - Comment: (Private listing)

                23 June 2010

                The Police Cross For Conspicious Gallantry (PCG).

                21 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian RLI beret. - Comment: (Private listing) Beret has Rhodesian period RLI beret badge. If it was Southern Rhodesian the beret badge would have the Queens Crown on the top.

                This seller's claims (he has copied from wikipedia) that Rhodesia was never named that legally because the name had not been changed as required under the law when it was the Colony of Southern Rhodesia are irrelevant. This is why. When Prime Minister Ian Smith declared the Unilateral Declaration of Independence from the United Kingdom on the 11 November 1965, under the law in that country then the former colony of Southern Rhodesia became Rhodesia. It is irrelevant that the British Government always referred to Rhodesia as the Colony of Southern Rhodesia as the colony had declared independence and parliament physically controlled all arms of the country including the military, police, banking, the economy etc. In 1970 when the government declared Rhodesia as a Republic all symbols of the Crown were removed. It was irrelevant what the British Government said about the name of Rhodesia at that time as the country had become independent. This seller is trying to use a pedantic and a revisionist point that quite clearly is wrong and it is equally wrong for this seller to label items as Southern Rhodesian when they were clearly made during the period of 1965-1979 and therefore are Rhodesian.

                21 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian Proficiency Red Cross Medal. - Comment: (Private listing) A British Proficiency in Red Cross work award. These are NOT Southern Rhodesian awards but British awards which also extended to their Territories. While this award could be awarded to someone living in Southern Rhodesia it would have to have written provenance to prove that.

                21 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian Miltary Police Beret. - Comment: (Private listing) Red beret for the Military Police didn't exist in 1964 and the badge is clearly post UDI which makes it Rhodesian.

                21 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian Regiment Army Brigade Badges. - Comment: (Private listing) These badges are genuine. However this seller has listed these as being Southern Rhodesian instead of Rhodesian. This seller's claims (he has copied from wikipedia) that Rhodesia was never named that legally because the name had not been changed as required under the law when it was the Colony of Southern Rhodesia are irrelevant. This is why. When Prime Minister Ian Smith declared the Unilateral Declaration of Independence from the United Kingdom on the 11 November 1965, under the law in that country then the former colony of Southern Rhodesia became Rhodesia. It is irrelevant that the British Government always referred to Rhodesia as the Colony of Southern Rhodesia as the colony had declared independence and parliament physically controlled all arms of the country including the military, police, banking, the economy etc. In 1970 when the government declared Rhodesia as a Republic all symbols of the Crown were removed. It was irrelevant what the British Government said about the name of Rhodesia at that time as the country had become independent. This seller is trying to use a pedantic and a revisionist point that quite clearly is wrong and it is equally wrong for this seller to label items as Southern Rhodesian when they were clearly made during the period of 1965-1979 and therefore are Rhodesian.

                17 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian BSAP Airwing Cloth Badges. - Comment: (Private listing) These are fakes of Rhodesian PRAW wings not Southern Rhodesia. They sold for AU$34.50 as a 'Buy it Now'. Genuine PRAW Wings would sell for AU$120 plus each.

                16 June 2010

                Southern Rhodesian Regiment Army items. - Comment: (Private listing) The Army patch is a fake. Only one badge is relevant to Southern Rhodesia and that is the Royal Rhodesia Regiment badge. The other badges are for Rhodesia and NOT Southern Rhodesia.

                To the seller of these items: Your snide remarks and verbal attack on my character and my knowledge of Rhodesian militaria that you have written on your listing doesn't bother me. Your verbal attack regarding this web site rates the same. Also do not lie and suggest that I send you emails when in fact I do not.

                14 June 2010

                Miltary Police Beret. - Comment: (Private listing)

                12 June 2010

                Rare set of Rhodesian Army patches. - Comment: (Private listing) Only the last patch is a Rhodesian Army patch and is quite common and are NOT rare at all. The first two patches are Boy Scouts patches.

                12 June 2010

                Army Shoulder patch.

                10 June 2010

                RLI Beret & Lanyard. - Comment: (Private listing) Also not an RLI lanyard as totally wrong colours.

                10 June 2010

                Rhodesian Red Cross Medal. - Comment: (Private listing)

                09 May 2010

                Pfumo re Vanhu (Spear of the Nation) Tracker patch.

                06 May 2010

                Rhodesia CID patch

                06 May 2010

                Spear of the Nation PI patch

                05 June 2010

                Rhodesia Police Support Unit patch.

                05 June 2010

                Rhodesian Internal Affairs Junior Warrant Officer.

                02 June 2010

                Rare set of Rhodesian Army badges. - Comment: (Private listing) Insignia are Northern Rhodesia Regiment and not Rhodesian. Northern Rhodesia was a separate colony. The insignia are also pre-UDI before Northern Rhodesia became the Republic of Zambia in 1964 and therefore have nothing to do with Rhodesia which was formed on the 11 November 1965.

                02 June 2010

                Rare set of Rhodesian Army patches. - Comment: (Private listing) Only the last patch is a Rhodesian Army patch and is quite common and are NOT rare at all. The first two patches are Boy Scouts patches.

                27 May 2010

                Selous Scouts badge in original packing. - Comment: All Selous Scouts insignia were made ONLY by Reuteler Manufacturing in Rhodesia.

                20 May 2010

                Selous Scouts berets. One has a lugged badge. - Comment: (Private listing) This seller has traded under three different usernames on ebay. His auctions are always listed as private.

                19 April 2010

                The Police Cross For Conspicious Gallantry (PCG) - Comment: This seller continues to list this medal and others as rare Rhodesian medals. The seller has been notified by me some time ago that they are NOT genuine but are poorly made copies. The seller has a Buy It Now price of US$1,500 for this copy.

                10 May 2010

                Rhodesian SAS white metal belt buckle & clasp - Rare Item - Comment: This seller has sold at least eight of these buckles. CAVEAT EMPTOR! This seller obviously has a number of these buckles in his possession as he continues to sell them on ebay. This is NOT a SAS buckle and clasp but the Rhodesian Army General Issue buckle that was worn on the white plastic belt. Worn with the Dress uniform (Greens) as shown in the photo below of the RLI. Why are the RLI wearing the belt that is supposed to be a belt worn by the SAS? The reason: IT IS A RHODESIAN ARMY GENERAL SERVICE BUCKLE AND BELT that was worn by numerous regiments when in dress uniform.

                Below is the full size Army General Service Belt with the buckle. This is listed on ebay and CORRECTLY DESCRIBED UNLIKE THE ABOVE LISTING.

                Approval to use photos kindly supplied by the seller.



                06 May 2010

                Rhodesia CID patch

                06 May 2010

                Spear of the Nation PI patch

                05 May 2010

                Rhodesian SAS white metal belt buckle & clasp - Rare Item - Comment: This seller obviously has a number of these buckles in his possession as he continues to sell them on ebay. This is NOT a SAS buckle and clasp but the Rhodesian Army General Issue buckle that was worn on the white plastic belt. Worn with the Dress uniform (Greens) as shown in the photo below of the RLI. Why are the RLI wearing the belt that is supposed to be a belt worn by the SAS? The reason: IT IS A RHODESIAN ARMY GENERAL SERVICE BUCKLE AND BELT that was worn by numerous regiments when in dress uniform.

                04 May 2010

                Rhodesian CIB (Combat Infantry Badge - unofficial) Patch

                22 April 2010

                Rhodesian SAS white metal belt buckle & clasp - Rare Item - Comment: This seller obviously has a number of these buckles in his possession as he continues to sell them on ebay. This is NOT a SAS buckle and clasp but the Rhodesian Army General Issue buckle that was worn on the white plastic belt. Worn with the Dress uniform (Greens) as shown in the photo below of the RLI. Why are the RLI wearing the belt that is supposed to be a belt worn by the SAS? The reason: IT IS A RHODESIAN ARMY GENERAL SERVICE BUCKLE AND BELT that was worn by numerous regiments when in dress uniform.

                17 April 2010

                The Police Cross For Conspicious Gallantry (PCG) - Comment: This seller continues to list this medal and others as rare Rhodesian medals. The seller has been notified by me some time ago that they are NOT genuine but are poorly made copies. The seller has a Buy It Now price of US$1,500 for this copy.

                11 April 2010

                Rhodesian SAS white metal belt buckle & clasp - Rare Item - Comment: This seller obviously has a number of these buckles in his possession as he continues to sell them on ebay. This is NOT a SAS buckle and clasp but the Rhodesian Army General Issue buckle that was worn on the white plastic belt. Worn with the Dress uniform (Greens) as shown in the photo below of the RLI. Why are the RLI wearing the belt that is supposed to be a belt worn by the SAS? The reason: IT IS A RHODESIAN ARMY GENERAL SERVICE BUCKLE AND BELT that was worn by numerous regiments when in dress uniform.

                Opinions written at the bottom of this listing regarding the quality of the Rhodesian SAS troops and Captain Robert MacKenzie SCR, BCR are just that - opinions. To make negative comments relating to Capt. MacKenzie's ability when he had been awarded the Silver Cross of Rhodesia and the Bronze Cross of Rhodesia, the second and third highest awards for gallantry in combat, are ill informed and absurd. To make comments about the lack of high quality troops in the SAS when they were regarded as some of the finest troops ever assembled in ANY SAS regiment in the world, is not only absurd but blatantly false. An opinion as given by the writer of these comments is not fact, it's only an opinion. While the seller has not made these comments he has listed them on this listing and when contacted by me, his answer appeared non-caring. CAVEAT EMPTOR!

                18 March 2010

                The Police Cross For Conspicious Gallantry (PCG) - Comment: This seller continues to list this medal and others as rare Rhodesian medals. The seller has been notified by me some time ago that they are NOT genuine but are poorly made copies. The seller has a Buy It Now price of US$1,500 for this copy.

                The above photo was kindly supplied by Jules Tennant, Co-Author "Anzac Elite". The Dan Sinh market in Ho Chi Minh City is also known as the "American" or "War Surplus" market. None of the militaria that is sold here is original, all are reproductions, made and aged to look like they are Vietnam war period items. In this case it is obvious that they have also decided to make Rhodesian camo uniforms. "CAVEAT EMPTOR" - "Let the buyer beware"



                It looks like Mr Pierce is back to his old tricks.

                He has also traded under the following names on ebay:

                1. glesgablue
                2. musicjack123 (now no longer used)
                3. wingstagger007
                4. rhodiesas
                5. janetreaclebear
                6. deltaexective (now no longer used)
                7. headlesswhiskas (now no longer used)


                This seller (John Pierce) came to my attention several years ago and is the person in the photo above. This photo was taken at an Armistice Day parade in Porthleven, Cornwall, England. This person is wearing an SAS beret and the medals are in the order he is wearing them; Bronze Cross of Rhodesia (BCR), Rhodesian General Service Medal (RGSM) and the South Atlantic Medal which was awarded for the Falklands Campaign.

                This person never served in the Rhodesian Security Forces, the Rhodesian SAS, the British SAS or the Parachute Regiment. He also never served in the Rhodesian Bush War or the Falklands Campaign.

                To read more about this person being exposed as a Walter Mitty and to see other photos, please see the following links.

                The Sun
                Daily Mail
                MOD Oracle

                This Wing was sold by him.


                The following copy SAS beret badge was also sold by him.


                And these non original and copied items below have been sold along with many other reproduced Rhodesian militaria by the same person over the last two years.


                One of the statements commonly used on the listings by the seller was: "I bought a box of Rhodesian Army militaria and these were in the box." The seller also lists them as genuine but also states that they weren't 100 percent sure. That statement looks contradictory to me.

                The following is an example.

                "For sale a set of Rhodesia SAS wings. I got these wings from a member of my family who served in the Rhodesian Bush War. I have no other history of these wings."

                Well it looks like his relative has given him a COPY of an SAS Parachute Wing for the camo or combat uniform, because that's exactly what this is! He is selling another copied Wing on ebay with this statement, "Selling Rhodesian C Sqn wings in good condition. I have no other history with these wings, other than they were given to a member of my family by a member of the Rhodesian Security Forces."

                Above is a shirt that sold on ebay by this seller, headlesswhiskas. While the shirt and ARMY patch are genuine, the Wing purporting to be a Rhodesian SAS Para Wing is a copy.

                My advice is: Caveat emptor - "Let the buyer beware!"




                The above item sold on ebay for AU$190 and was listed as a RARE MILITARY JACKET (SELOUS SCOUTS RHODESIA, AFRICA). Part of the description on this listing stated: "THIS UNIFORM THE SELOUS SCOUTS WAS FROM A SPECIAL FORCES TYPE OF UNIT IN THE EARLY 1950S IN AFRICA ALONG WITH THE ENGLISH SOLDIERS WHO FOUGHT IN AN ELITE TYPE OF MILITARY ENCOUNTERS.."

                I am sure that even though a small number of soldiers in the Selous Scouts were English, the fact remains that the overwhelming majority of the Selous Scouts were Rhodesians. Of course the Selous Scouts did not exist in the 1950's, but that is not the reason this jacket is listed. The seller stated that the tag inside the jacket read: "ADDER BOX 1 POFADDER 8890 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA". To my knowledge the camouflage uniforms worn by the Security Forces were made in Rhodesia and not South Africa. The Selous Scouts rank slides I believe are not genuine and I notified the seller that this was the case. I also offered that if I was sent a closeup scan or photo of the rank slides I would confirm it. The seller never put this information on his listing.


                The above item has been listed on ebay by brigadeuk as a RHODESIAN SAS SPECIAL AIR SERVICE WINGS GENUINE ISSUE.

                His listing states: THIS ITEM IS A SUPERB REGIMENTAL MOD APPROVED REGIMENTAL CRESTED / BADGED ITEM, SOLD HERE IN THE UK UNDER LICENCE. THESE ARE NOT CHEAP OVERSEAS IMPORTS BUT THEY ARE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE CERTIFIED AND APPROVED ORIGINAL SPECIFICATION BADGED ITEMS MADE FROM THE CORRECT MATERIALS AND DESIGNS SET BY THE MOD. A TRUE COLLECTORS PIECE AND HARD TO FIND BRAND NEW AND AT THIS PRICE TOO WHICH IS A FRACTION OF TRUE RECOMMENDED RETAIL PRICE THAT OTHER COMPANIES CHARGE FOR LESSER QUALITY CHEAP METAL ITEMS FROM ABROAD. THIS ITEM IS SOLD DIRECTLY UNDER LICENCE BY BRIGADE UK LTD WHICH IS A COMPANY RUN EXCLUSIVELY BY FORMER SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN AS THAT IS ALL THAT WE EMPLOY HERE.

                When I messaged the seller and asked him "So the Wing is a copy of a Rhodesian SAS Para Wing for the dress uniform, not a genuine one?" his reply was rude and sarcastic. When I sent him an email and told him that the above item was not a genuine Rhodesian SAS Para Wing for the dress uniform and I sent him the links to this web site and suggested he looked at it, he sent me the following reply:
                "listen this is boring now, opinion is life itself and you are entitled to one yourself but it does not make you an authority now take your bollox elsewhere my friend i have a business to run ok"

                The following was sent to me by a collector friend so I have copied it here. These are some of the points why this para wing is a fake and/or copy.

                1. The Dress Greens wool is too green and not as dark as the original wings.
                2. The shape of the lower edge of the two center shrouds are not similar to the original wings.
                3. The shroud lines in white should have 9+ stitches to them not 6+ the thread should also be thinner.
                4. The black shroud lines stitching is too far apart as well and the thread is too course.
                5. The stitching between the feathers of the wings has the same problem as #3, and #4
                6. The gauze backing to the wings is completely different than the original.
                7. The shape of the Dress Green backing is is rounded and does not have the sharp edges on the wing tips. In fact the original wings were cut out by hand and were very irregular in shape, these wings look to be dye cut and too perfect.
                The seller in his description states the following:
                1. That this para wing is MOD approved. If this para wing was genuine it would have been made in Rhodesia NOT in England and therefore it would have had no connection to the MOD. Rhodesian Para Wings used in Rhodesia after UDI came under the Rhodesian "Dress Regulations of the Army - 1967", not under any regulations of the MOD or any other authority in the U.K.

                2. That this para wing is sold in the U.K. under license, that it is MOD certified and approved original specification made from the correct materials and designs set by the MOD. If this para wing was an original, how could it be sold in the U.K. under license when Rhodesia does not exist as a country, the Rhodesian Security Forces have not existed since 1980 and the genuine wings have not been made since 1980. As outlined in point No.1, genuine Rhodesian SAS Para Wings are not and were not MOD certified and the wing shown here DOES NOT meet the original specifications of the genuine wings. As to the issue of this wing being made from the correct materials, this is impossible as the original materials would no longer exist.

                The wall plaque above was also listed by this seller as a GENUINE SELOUS SCOUTS REGIMENTAL MESS PLAQUE .

                The definition of genuine on Dictionary.com states: 1. possessing the claimed or attributed character, quality, or origin; not counterfeit; authentic; real: genuine sympathy; a genuine antique.

                The above wall plaque is NOT a genuine Selous Scouts wall plaque BUT a commemorative wall plaque. I have been informed by the Selous Scouts Association that this wall plaque IS NOT one of their plaques. Therefore the seller of this plaque cannot claim it to be a genuine Selous Scouts Regimental Mess Plaque as it was not made during the Bush War and has not been authorised by the Association since the end of the war.



                The above item has been listed on ebay by 1xfu as a rare Badge attributed to the Selous Scout Association.

                His listing states:

                An opportunity to purchase a rare Badge attributed to the Selous Scout Association. This badge has been in my collection for many years and it is the only one I have seen. Measuring approximately 2cm across and 9mm in height, this pin badge is rare.

                The Selous Scouts Association have no knowledge of this miniature badge and say it is not attributed to them. They have described it as "rubbish!" The seller has been notified that the badge is not an Association badge but he still has not added anything to his listing to change the fact that it is a fake NOT a genuine item.




                Ebay seller old_club_badges is listed here because of his selling of copies of Rhodesian militaria, some of which he lists on ebay as GENUINE. This seller also trades under the username of germanbadges.

                Just yesterday (14th January 2008) he sold what he listed as: RARE ORIGINAL RHODESIAN RHODESIA SELOUS SCOUTS OFFICERS SILVER BADGE THIS IS A CAST BADGE WITH MAKERS NAME AND SILVER TO REVERSE 37MM TIP TO TIP 33MM HIGH


                This is a copy. Why?

                1. As my web site states: As with other Officer's insignia made by Reuteler Mfg, these were also made from solid Silver, highly detailed and 'Struck' NOT 'Cast'. The only exception was the SAS Officer's Collar badges which were constructed from bi-metal.
                2. The Selous Scouts Officers Beret and Collar badges made by Reuteler Manufacturing ALL had brass lugs. THERE WERE NO EXCEPTIONS.
                3. The lugs are shoddily made and are not the usual 'Reuteler' style lugs.
                4. The measurements of ALL the Selous Scouts Officers Beret badges are: Height 34mm x Width from wingtip to wingtip 40mm or to be exact Height 34.55mm x Width 39.95. This makes his measurements wrong.
                5. The reverse of the badge showed pitting and a course surface which is what you would get from a cast badge. This was not the case of Reuteler made Officers badges that were struck. There is also no striations on the reverse of the badge, this is important.


                The above photo is of an ORIGINAL Rhodesian Selous Scouts officers insignia taken from my website.

                I messaged the seller to inform him that this was indeed a COPY and not a GENUINE Rhodesian Selous Scouts officers beret badge. I never received a reply back. The seller also never bothered changing the listing or never added my comments to the listing after I had informed him that it was not genuine. The badge then sold for GBP109 (AU$239.22). Someone has bought what they think is a genuine badge when in fact they have bought a badge worth very little and it is COPY.

                This auction was also listed where the User ID is kept private. While sellers have the choice when they list an item on ebay, that they can have the User ID (Bidder) kept private, I have never understood why. This always concerns me why sellers choose this option. I can see no reason why this option would be chosen other than to hide the bidders names so that they cannot be contacted and informed that they are bidding on an item that is not genuine.


                The above ORIGINAL Selous Scouts officers beret and collar badge was sold on ebay by the same seller on the 16 February 2008.


                The above ORIGINAL Selous Scouts officers beret and collar badge was sold on ebay by the same seller on the 16 February 2008.

                If this seller was able to list and sell an ORIGINAL Selous Scouts officers beret and collar badge on the 16 February 2008, why was he not able to tell the difference between these and the COPY of a Selous Scouts officers beret badge that he listed and sold on the 14 January 2008? I would have thought that it would have been fairly easy to tell the difference between them. Let me give you an example. Look at the collage photo below.


                It is very simple to tell the differences between these two badges.

                1. The genuine badge has BRASS lugs and the copy has SILVER lugs. Reuteler Manufacturing made all of the Selous Scouts Officers insignia and ALWAYS USED BRASS LUGS.
                2. The genuine badge shows it is SMOOTH on the reverse while the COPY is PITTED on the reverse. Why? The genuine officers silver insignia were STRUCK and the copies are CAST. An explanation of the difference between 'Struck' and 'Cast' badges can be found on the Selous Scouts Officers Insignia page.

                  These are two of the main points that show the differences between these two badges. Both badges were sold on ebay within one month of each other. Both were sold by the same seller but under different ebay usernames. The copy was sold under old_club_badges and the genuine beret and collar badges were sold under germanbadges.

                  This seller also had the following copied Rhodesian items listed on ebay:

                  1. BSAP Support Unit 2nd issue patch, listed as original.
                  2. Rhodesian Air Force Navigator Wing.
                  3. Rhodesian SAS Officers Beret bullion badge, that he said he got from Reuteler before he closed down in Zimbabwe. Claimed as original.
                  4. Rhodesian SAS Metal Beret badge with slider and stamped Reutler Mfg, Rhod. He stated on the listing that "according to experts these never existed, but these came from original Reuteler stock in the 1980's." Claimed as original
                  5. Rhodesian Air Force PJI Wing for the combat uniform.
                  6. Selous Scouts cloth Parachute Wing that he stated on the listing, "Possibly a period piece?"
                3. Shown above is a collage I have made of a genuine BSAP Support Unit 1st issue shoulder patch on the left and the unoriginal BSAP Support Unit 1st issue shoulder patch on the right that is being sold by old_club_badges. He listed the patch as; ORIGINAL RHODESIAN ARMY RHODESIA SUPPORT UNIT PATCH. The important word here is 'Original'. This patch is a REPRODUCTION!

                  There are very clear differences here:

                  1. Different material.
                  2. The line of the shield on the copy is thicker.
                  3. The body and head of the eagle on the copy is broader with less definition.
                  4. The wing feathers on the copy are poorly defined.
                  5. The eagle tail feathers of the copy are shorter and broader.
                  6. The eagles claws on the copy are very poorly defined.
                  7. The title of Support Unit on the copy are too thick.


          The above badge is a FAKE.This badge has been stamped on the slide to insinuate that it was made by Reuteler Manufacturing in Salisbury. A number of these badges have been sold by this seller over time. He says that these came from original Reuteler stock in 1980's.

          I want to put this to rest once and for all and you the reader can draw your on conclusions.

          1. Reuteler NEVER made any Rhodesian insignia with slides.
          2. The SAS NEVER wore any Beret badges with slides.
          3. These NEVER came from Reuteler stock, because he doesn't know anything about them.

      A friend of mine sent me an email on the 19/01/08 to tell me that he had seen Werner Reuteler on that day and again asked him about any badges he may have made with a slide instead of loops/lugs, and Werner confirmed he never used slides at any time. As Werner Reuteler (Reuteler Manufacturing PVT) was the maker of SAS Beret and Officers Beret and Collar badges, this shows once and for all that these badges are indeed FAKES. This demonstrates that when the seller is stating that these came from original Reuteler stock in the 1980's THAT HE IS INCORRECT!





      Ebay seller in the U.S. selling under the name of 'usnusa' has sold fake Police Reserve Air Wings (PRAW). They are metal and supposedly gold plated. His listing also states "Gold finish has darkened some over time but badge continues to have a fine and quite rare appearance." PRAW Wings were NEVER metal but cloth and gold bullion wire. I have informed the seller of these facts.





1524 Page Views
COPYRIGHT RHODESIAN MILITARIA.